Compositions and methods for use of IL-12 as an adjuvant

ABSTRACT

Improved vaccine compositions and methods of making same are provided, which vaccines are characterized by an antigen from a pathogen and an effective adjuvanting amount of Interleukin-12. These IL-12 adjuvanted vaccines are capable of increasing the vaccinated host&#39;s cell mediated immune response to provide an increased and protective immune response to the pathogen. Also disclosed are methods for vaccinating hosts by administering a vaccine containing an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism and co-administering an adjuvanting amount of IL-12. Vaccines or therapeutic compositions directed against a cancer may also be adjuvanted with IL-12 according to this invention.

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/965,688, filed Nov. 6, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,976,539, issued Nov. 2, 1999, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/621,493, filed Mar.25, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,723,127; which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/265,087, filed Jun. 17, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,515; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/229,282, filed Apr. 18, 1994, now abandoned.

This invention was made with financial assistance of National Institutes of Health Grant Nos. AL30073, CA20833, CA10815, CA32898, CA40256 and A120846. The United States government has certain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to adjuvantation, and to the use of IL-12 as an adjuvant in pharmaceutical compositions, particularly in vaccines against infections requiring enhanced cell mediated immune (CMI) responses for effective protection against infection by a pathogen.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The immune system uses many mechanisms for attacking pathogens, but not all of these are activated after immunization. Protective immunity induced by vaccination is dependent on the capacity of the vaccine to elicit the appropriate immune response to either resist, control, or eliminate the pathogen. Depending on the pathogen, this may require a cell-mediated or humoral immune response, which, in turn, is determined by the nature of the T cells that develop after immunization. For example, many bacterial, protozoal and intracellular parasitic and viral infections appear to require a strong cell-mediated immune response for protection, while other pathogens, such as helminths, primarily respond to a humoral, or antibody, response.

The current paradigm of the role of T cells in the particular immune response is that CD4⁺ T cells can be separated into subsets on the basis of the repertoire of cytokines produced and that the distinct cytokine profile observed in these cells determines their function. This T cell model includes two major subsets: T_(H)1 cells that produce IL-2 and interferon γ (IFN-γ) and mediate cellular immune responses, and T_(H)2 cells that produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 and augment humoral immune responses [T. R. Mosmann et al, J. Immunol., 126:2348 (1986)].

Many vaccine compositions employ adjuvants, that is, substances which enhance the immune response when administered together with an immunogen or antigen. Adjuvants are thought to function in several ways, including by increasing the surface area of antigen, prolonging the retention of the antigen in the body thus allowing time for the lymphoid system to have access to the antigen, slowing the release of antigen, targeting antigen to macrophages, activating macrophages, or otherwise eliciting non-specific activation of the cells of the immune system [see, e.g., H. S. Warren et al, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 4:369 (1986)]. Currently, an essential role of adjuvants in vaccines is to direct CD4⁺ T cell subset differentiation, although how adjuvants perform this function is poorly understood.

The ability of a adjuvant to induce and increase a specific type of immune response and the identification of that ability is thus a key factor in the selection of particular adjuvants for vaccine use against a particular pathogen. Typical adjuvants include water and oil emulsions, e.g., Freund's adjuvant, and chemical compounds such as aluminum hydroxide or alum. At present, alum is the only adjuvant approved in the United States for human vaccines; it has been determined that alum induces the production of T_(H)2 cells.

Many of the most effective adjuvants include bacteria or their products, e.g., microorganisms such as the attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis, bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG); microorganism components, e.g., alum-precipitated diphtheria toxoid, bacterial lipopolysaccharide and endotoxins. However, the role that the bacteria play is ill-defined. Recently, it has been noted that many bacteria or their products, lipopolysaccharide, Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and C. parvum, stimulate IL-12 production by macrophages [A. D'Andrea et al, J. Exp. Med., 176:1387 (1992)].

However, despite their immunostimulating properties, many bacterial adjuvants have toxic or other negative effects, particularly in humans. For example, such a large population has been exposed to some of the bacterial adjuvants, like BCG, that there is a danger of eliciting a secondary response with future use as a vaccine adjuvant. Heat-killed bacteria, being non-native to mammalian hosts, also risk causing toxic effects in the host. In fact, the only currently well-accepted adjuvant for human use is the compound, alum.

Thus, there exists a need in the art for additional adjuvants which are useful in stimulating or enhancing the host's immune responses without inducing a toxic effect, and which are suitable for use in pharmaceutical compositions, such as vaccines.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition useful as a vaccine comprising an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism and an effective adjuvanting amount of the protein, Interleukin-12 (IL-12), the resulting composition capable of eliciting the vaccinated host's cell-mediated immunity for a protective response to the pathogen. Preferably the pathogen against which the vaccine is directed is an intracellular parasite, such as a virus, bacterium, or protozoan. The pathogen may also be an extracellular parasite, e.g., a helminth or bacterium. The antigen may be a whole cell, a protein, a protein subunit or fragment. Also preferably the IL-12 is recombinant IL-12 or a biologically active fragment thereof.

In another aspect, the invention provides for a composition comprising DNA sequences encoding the antigen from a pathogenic microorganism, a subunit, or a fragment thereof, rather than the protein or peptide itself. These DNA sequences, together with appropriate promoter sequences, may be employed directly (“naked DNA”) as an antigen administered with, or close in time to, the IL-12 adjuvant. Alternatively, these DNA sequences may be transduced in alternate vaccine strains of the pathogenic microorganism, and upon expression in vivo may provide the antigen of the vaccine.

In still another aspect, the invention provides for the use of DNA sequences encoding IL-12, a subunit, or a fragment thereof. These DNA sequences, together with appropriate promoter sequences, may be employed directly (“naked DNA”) as an adjuvant administered with, or close in time to, the antigen of the pathogenic microorganism. Alternatively, these DNA sequences may be transduced in alternate vaccine strains of the pathogenic microorganism, and upon expression in vivo may adjuvant the-vaccine.

In yet a further embodiment, the DNA sequences encoding the antigen, a subunit, or a fragment thereof may be operably linked to, or co-transfected with the DNA sequences encoding IL-12, as subunit, or a fragment thereof.

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for preparing a vaccine composition containing an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism with enhanced ability to elicit the vaccinated host's CMI response against a pathogen or a DNA sequence encoding the antigen by adding to the vaccine composition an effective amount of the protein IL-12, an IL-12 subunit, or a biologically active fragment thereof or alternatively DNA sequences encoding IL-12, a subunit of IL-12, or a fragment thereof.

In still a further aspect the invention provides a method for increasing the ability of a vaccine composition containing an antigen from a pathogen (as protein and/or subunit, ‘naked’ DNA, or transduced DNA or a biologically active fragment thereof) to elicit the vaccinate's CMI for a protective immune response against the pathogen by administering to the vaccinate either simultaneously with or sequentially to the vaccine composition, an effective adjuvanting amount of IL-12 (as protein and/or subunit, ‘naked’ DNA, or transduced DNA or a biologically active fragment thereof).

In another aspect, the invention provides a therapeutic composition for the treatment or amelioration of the symptoms of cancer, and a method for adjuvanting a therapeutic cancer “vaccine”. A cancer vaccine or therapeutic may comprise an antigen expressed on the surface of a cancer cell. This antigen may be naturally present on the cancer cell. Alternatively, the cancer cell may be manipulated ex vivo and transfected with a selected antigen, which it then expresses when introduced into the patient. An exemplary therapeutic composition described herein can contain the protein B7 (either alone as a protein, biologically active fragment or ‘naked’ DNA encoding same) or preferably a B7 transfected cancer cell in combination with IL-12 (as protein and/or subunit, ‘naked’ DNA or transduced DNA or a biologically active fragment thereof). The co-administration of IL-12 with a B7 preparation enhances the T-cell stimulating activity of the B7 preparation.

Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a graph providing the results of in vitro gamma interferon (IFN-γ; solid square) and Interleukin-4 (IL-4; open circle) production by lymph node (LN) cells taken from normal BALB/c mice (“none”) or mice inoculated subcutaneously three days previously with soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA), SLA+IL-12, or IL-12 alone, as described in Example 1 below. The C3H/HeN mice were used as controls only.

FIG. 1B is a graph plotting effector to target (E:T) ratio against specific lysis (%) which provides the natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxic response of LN cells from BALB/c mice immunized with nothing (control, open circle), SLA (solid circle), SLA+IL-12 (solid triangle) or IL-12 only (solid square) against YAC-1 target cells. The cytokine responses depicted are from one representative experiment out of five, in which the mean IFN-γ levels in mice immunized with SLA and SLA+IL-12 were 4.6±1.1 and 114±20 ng/ml, respectively (P<0.005). In five out of five experiments, IL-12 reduced IL-4 levels to less than 1 U/ml.

FIG. 2A is a graph reporting the results representative of two or more experiments studying cytokine responses (IL-4, open circle; γ-IFN, solid square) of unfractionated or CD4⁺ T cell enriched popliteal lymph nodes harvested from BALB/c mice 10 days after immunization with SLA alone or SLA+IL-12; none refers to untreated animals. Only the data from cells cultured with SLA (50 μg/ml) are shown since in the absence of antigen there was no response.

FIG. 2B is a graph plotting the results representative of two or more experiments studying the same cytokine responses of FIG. 2A of unfractionated or CD4⁺ T cell enriched spleen cells harvested from BALB/c mice 10 days after immunization with IL-12 alone, SLA alone, and SLA+IL-12; none refers to untreated animals. Additionally, one group of mice was depleted of NK cell activity before immunization with SLA+IL-12 by pretreatment with anti-asialo GM1 (aASGM1) [WAKO, Richmond, Va.], which is an antibody to an antigen found preferentially on NK cells.

FIG. 3A is a graph plotting weeks of infection vs. lesion size for unimmunized BALB/c mice (▴), BALB/c mice immunized with SLA (◯) or SLA+IL-12 (▪), and normal C3H/HeN mice (□). Each mouse was injected in the left footpad with 1×10⁵ purified metacyclic L. major promastigates and the course of infection monitored by measurement of lesion size. Each data point represents the mean lesion size of live mice. Differences in lesion size between control or SLA and SLA+IL-12 were significant from week four onward. Similar results were obtained in three experiments.

FIG. 3B is a graph plotting the course of infection in unimmunized C3H/HeN mice as compared with that in BALB/c mice immunized with SLA+IL-12. Immunization and symbols are the same as described for FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4 is a graph plotting cell proliferation vs. PHA-blast:L cells ratio. Medium alone is symbolized by a circle with a plus; IL-12 by a square with a plus; IL-12 and B7-transfected L cells by a solid square; IL-12 and untransfected L cells by an empty square; B7 transfected L cells only by a solid circle; and untransfected L cells by an empty circle.

FIG. 5 is a bar graph charting amount of IFN-γ in U/ml vs. PHA-blast:CHO-cell ratios indicated for IL-12 at concentrations of 1 ng/ml indicated by a clear rectangle, 0.3 ng/ml by a rectangle with slanted lines; and 0.1 ng/ml by a cross-hatched rectangle, or no IL-12 by a solid rectangle.

FIG. 6A is a bar graph charting IFN-γ production vs. inducers in which the PHA blasts are grown. Symbols used are clear rectangle for antibody to CD3; crosshatched rectangle for IL-2; hatched rectangle for IL-12 and solid rectangle for medium. The experiment is described in Example 5, part I.

FIG. 6B is a bar graph charting TNF-α production vs inducers. Symbols are as for FIG. 6A.

FIG. 6C is a bar graph charting GM—CSF production vs inducers. Symbols are as for FIG. 6A.

FIG. 7A is a graph plotting IFN-γ production vs. CTLA-41g concentration in PBMC. Symbols are solid square for IL-12 and B7 transfected CHO cells; clear square for transfected cells only; solid circle for IL-12 only and clear circles for medium only. The experiment is described in Example 5J.

FIG. 7B is a graph plotting IFN-γ production vs. CTLA-41g concentration in PHA-blasts. All symbols are as in FIG. 7A.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides novel vaccine compositions and methods of adjuvantation of vaccines intended to provide a protective cell-mediated immune response in vaccinated host mammals against certain pathogens using as an adjuvant, IL-12. Most-desirably, the invention is directed to vaccines which rely on enhancing the vaccinated host's cell-mediated immunity, i.e., the elicitation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and activated phagocytes, to provide protection against infection by the selected pathogen.

The present invention also provides novel therapeutic compositions and methods of adjuvantation intended to provide a synergistic effect with certain therapeutic compositions, particularly so-called “cancer vaccines”, which include a selected antigen occurring naturally on a cancer cell or a cancer cell transfected with, and capable of expressing, a selected antigen, e.g., B7. Such compositions may demonstrate an enhanced proliferative effect on T cells and cytokine production thereby. This proliferative effect may exhibit some. resistance to chemotherapeutics and thus provide another therapeutic agent and regimen for cancer treatment or in the stimulation of the immune response in the environment of inflamed tissues.

Interleukin-12 (IL-12), originally called natural killer cell stimulatory factor, is a heterodimeric cytokine described, for example, in M. Kobayashi et al, J. Exp. Med., 1709:827 (1989). The expression and isolation of IL-12 protein in recombinant host cells is described in detail in International Patent Application WO90/05147,-published May 17, 1990 (also European patent application No. 441,900), incorporated by reference herein. The DNA and amino acid sequences of the 30 kd and 40 kd subunits of the heterodimeric human IL-12 are provided in the above recited international application, and are reproduced in the Sequence Listing attached hereto. Research quantities of recombinant human and murine IL-12 are also available from Genetics Institute, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. IL-12 has been found to stimulate IFN-γ production by NK cells and T cells [S. H. Chan et al, J. Exp. Med., 173:869 (1991)]. Therapeutic effects of IL-12 administered systemically have been reported [See, e.g., F. P. Heinzel et al, J. Exp. Med., 177:1505 (1993) and J. P. Sypek et al, ibid, p. 1797, among others]. Where it is used throughout the examples, the term IL-12 refers to the heterodimeric protein unless smaller fragments thereof are specifically identified.

As discussed in detail in the examples below, the inventors have discovered a new use for IL-12, including fragments of IL-12 which share the same biological activity of the full-length protein as well as the DNA sequences which encode IL-12 or fragments thereof. IL-12 and biologically active fragments thereof and alternatively the ‘naked’ or transduced DNA encoding the IL-12 can be employed as an effective adjuvant, particularly for vaccines which require the stimulation of protective cell-mediated immunity against the pathogen.

Diseases requiring CMI stimulation for effective protection may be broadly defined. For example, diseases caused by intracellular or extracellular parasites, certain bacterium, protozoan, helminths and viruses are most likely to require CMI for protection. Desirable viral vaccines candidates which may be enhanced by adjuvantation with IL-12 include, without limitation, HIV, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, rabies virus, poliovirus, influenza virus, meningitis virus, measles virus, mumps virus, rubella, pertussis, encephalitis virus, papilloma virus, yellow fever virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parvovirus, chikungunya virus, haemorrhagic fever viruses, Klebsiella, and Herpes viruses, particularly, varicella, cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus.

Bacterial vaccines against leprosy and tuberculosis, among others, should also benefit from the use of IL-12 adjuvant. Similarly, vaccines for the induction of protection against parasitic infections such as leishmaniasis and malaria, among others, may also be adjuvanted with IL-12 according to this invention. Still another vaccine which can employ IL-12 adjuvantation is a vaccine against a protozoan, e.g., T. cruzii, or against a helminth, e.g., Schistosoma.

The adjuvanting effect of IL-12 on a vaccine directed against the intracellular parasite causing leishmaniasis in the examples detailed below provides evidence that it is an important component in vaccines against diseases and disease-causing pathogens which require the induction of cell-mediated immunity, e.g., the induction of CTLs and activated phagocytes, for effective protection.

As illustrated in the examples below, the protein IL-12 or a biologically active fragment thereof (or 'naked DNA sequence encoding IL-12), preferably produced by synthetic or recombinant means, may be used as an effective adjuvant in place of conventional bacterial adjuvants.

When used as an adjuvant for a selected vaccine composition containing an antigen of a pathogenic microorganism, IL-12 is desirably admixed as part of the vaccine composition itself. One of skill in the art of vaccine composition is expected to be able to readily determine suitable amounts of IL-12 to adjuvant particular vaccines. Such amounts will depend upon the pathogen for which the vaccine is designed, the nature of the antigen, the dosage amounts of the antigen as well as the species and physical and medical conditions (e.g., general healthy, weight, etc.) of the vaccinate. As one example, an effective adjuvanting amount of IL-12 protein is desirably between about 0.1 μg to about 0.5 mg of IL-12 protein per about 25 μg of antigen. The adjuvanting amount for any particular vaccine will be readily defined by balancing the efficacy and toxicity of the IL-12 and antigen combination.

When it is administered as part of a vaccine composition, IL-12 is administered by the same route as the vaccinal antigen. Any route of administration may be employed for the administration of this vaccine, e.g., subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, oral, intramuscular, intranasal and the like.

Alternatively, the adjuvanting effect of IL-12 may be employed by administering IL-12 separately from the vaccine composition. When separately administered, the IL-12 is desirably in the presence of a suitable carrier, such as saline and optionally conventional pharmaceutical agents enabling gradual release of the protein. The amount of the IL-12 used in this mode of vaccination is similar to the ranges identified above when IL-12 is part of the vaccine composition. The IL-12 may be administered contemporaneously with the vaccine composition, either simultaneously therewith, or before the vaccine antigen administration. If the IL-12 is administered before the vaccine composition, it is desirable to administer it about one or more days before the vaccine. When IL-12 is administered as a separate component from the vaccine, it is desirably administered by the same route as the vaccinal antigen, e.g., subcutaneous route, or any other route as selected by a physician.

In addition to the administration of the IL-12 protein as an adjuvant, it is also anticipated that nucleic acid sequences encoding IL-12 or a fragment thereof may be used as an adjuvant. The nucleic acid sequences, preferably in the form of DNA, may be delivered to a vaccinate for in vivo expression of the IL-12 protein or peptide. So-called ‘naked DNA’ may be used to express the IL-12 protein or peptide fragment in vivo in a patient. [See, e.g., J. Cohen, Science, 259:1691-1692 (Mar. 19, 1993); E. Fynan et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 90: 11478-11482 (December 1993); J. A. Wolff et al, Biotechniques, 11:474-485 (1991) which describe similar uses of ‘naked DNA’, all incorporated by reference herein]. For example, IL-12 DNA may be incorporated, or transduced, into the microorganism itself, if the whole pathogen itself is to be employed as the vaccinal antigen. Alternatively, IL-12 DNA may be administered as part of the vaccine composition or separately, but contemporaneously with the vaccine antigen, e.g., by injection. Still other modes of delivering IL-12 to the vaccinate in the form of DNA are known to those of skill in the art and may be employed rather than administration of the IL-12 protein, as desired. For example, the IL-12 DNA may be administered as part of a vector or as a cassette containing the IL-12 DNA sequences operatively linked to a promoter sequence. See, e.g., International Patent Application PCT WO94/01139, published Jan. 20, 1994. Briefly, the DNA encoding the IL-12 protein or desired fragment thereof may be inserted into a nucleic acid cassette. This cassette may be engineered to contain, in addition to the IL-12 sequence to be expressed, other optional flanking sequences which enable its insertion into a vector. This cassette may then be inserted into an appropriate DNA vector downstream of a promoter, an mRNA leader sequence, an initiation site and other regulatory sequences capable of directing the replication and expression of that sequence in vivo. This vector permits infection of vaccinate's cells and expression of the IL-12 in vivo.

When IL-12 nucleic acid sequences are used as an adjuvant, these sequences may be operably linked to DNA sequences which encode the antigen. Hence, the vector or cassette, as described above, encoding the IL-12 DNA sequences may additionally include sequences encoding the antigen. Each of these sequences may be operatively linked to the promoter sequence of the vector or cassette. Alternatively, ‘naked DNA’ encoding the antigen may be in a separate plasmid. Where present in one or two plasmids, the naked DNA encoding the antigen and/or IL-12, upon introduction into the host cells, permits the infection of vaccinate's cells and expression of both IL-12 and the antigen In vivo.

When IL-12 nucleic acid sequences are employed as the adjuvant either as ‘naked DNA’ operatively linked to a selected promoter sequence or transduced into a strain of the pathogenic microorganism, rather than the protein itself, the amounts of DNA to be delivered and the routes of delivery may parallel the IL-12 protein amounts and delivery described above and may also be determined readily by one of skill in the art. Similarly the amounts of the antigen as DNA would be selected by one of skill in the art.

Because the induction of IL-12 may be the key component to vaccine efficacy when cell-mediated immunity is required, the use of IL-12 as an adjuvant may be preferable to known adjuvants. For example, unlike adjuvants, such as γ-IFN or IL-2, IL-12 is relatively stable in vivo. Moreover, when γ-IFN was studied by these inventors to adjuvant an L. major vaccine, it was not effective alone as an adjuvant, but required the additional presence of a bacterial adjuvant, C. parvum.

IL-12 as an adjuvant also has an advantage over alum for use in human vaccines. Alum induces T_(H)2 helper cells rather than the T_(H)1 cells induced by IL-12, and thus, alum adjuvanted vaccines may be ineffectual for those pathogenic microorganisms against which a TH1 response is most effective.

Additionally, IL-12 is superior to bacterial adjuvants, such as BCG, which may induce IL-12 as well as other agents or results which may be unanticipated or not controlled. More desirably, IL-12 as an adjuvant should not. induce the uncontrolled production of other cytokines, as do bacterial adjuvants which induce IL-12 among a host of other cytokines. Unlike bacterial adjuvants, IL-12 is human in origin and thus unlikely to produce any sensitization. For example in the L. major vaccine model below, vaccination by the subcutaneous route was difficult with other adjuvants, e.g., a combination of γ-IFN and C. parvum, but was successful with IL-12 as adjuvant. As demonstrated with this model, local (sub-cutaneous) injection of IL-12 was not associated with any obvious adverse effects, and there was no appreciable alteration in cell populations within the draining lymph nodes after IL-12 injection.

Thus, it is anticipated that IL-12 will be a highly useful adjuvant for use in human vaccines.

It is further anticipated that IL-12 can be used as an adjuvant in so-called therapeutic vaccines for certain cancers and solid tumors, in a manner similar to that disclosed above for its use as an adjuvant for vaccines containing antigens of a pathogenic microorganism. Particularly where CMI is considered a component of protection against the particular cancer, the use of IL-12 as an adjuvant in a cancer vaccine or therapeutic is encompassed by the present invention. Cancer vaccines typically include an antigen expressed on and isolated from a cancer cell or a cancer cell transfected with, and capable of expressing, a selected antigen. For example, any purified tumor antigen may be co-administered with IL-12 as described above for pathogenic vaccines. Identification of relevant cancer antigens will permit the development of such vaccines. Alternatively, other cancer therapeutics are designed using an antigen normally not expressed on a cancer cell. That selected antigen is transfected into the cancer cell and the transfected cell itself, expressing the antigen, is used as the vaccine or therapeutic. Such a vaccine or therapeutic may be co-administered with IL-12 to obtain the adjuvantation effect. The adjuvantation of such vaccines can be accomplished by resort to the above disclosure by one of skill in the art.

The following Examples 1 through 4 illustratively describe a model of the use of recombinant IL-12 in adjuvanting a selected vaccine preparation for Leishmania major. Example 5 provides support for the analogous use of IL-12 in adjuvanting the therapeutic effect of a ‘cancer vaccine’, based on the use of the soluble cell surface glycoprotein B7 [See, S. E. Townsend and James P. Allison, Science, 259:368-370 (Jan. 15, 1993)]. These examples are for illustration and do not limit the scope of the present invention.

EXAMPLE 1 Leishmaniasis Model of IL-12 Adjuvant Use

This example demonstrates that IL-12 enhances T_(H)1 cell development in vivo and can replace both C. parvum and IFN-γ as a adjuvant in a vaccine against leishmaniasis.

A. The Leishmaniasis Model

The protozoan parasite Leishmania major causes leishmaniasis, either a healing or nonhealing cutaneous lesion in mice, depending on the CD4⁺ T_(H) cell subset that dominates. Protection requires leishmanial-specific CD4⁺ T helper (T_(H)) cells. In BALB/c mice, L. major infection usually leads to a dominant CD4⁺ T_(H)2 response, uncontrolled lesion development, metastasis of the parasite, and eventual death of the animal, whereas many other mouse strains (for example, C3H/HeN and C57BL/6) develop a T_(H)1 response, control parasite multiplication, and heal [P. Scott et al, J. Exp. Med., 168:1675 (1988); F. P. Heinzel et al, ibid, 169:59 (1989)].

Interferon γ is required for T_(H)1 cell development in this model, since in vivo depletion of IFN-γ before infection abrogates T_(H)1 cell development in resistant C3H/HeN mice, leading to a dominant T_(H)2 response and susceptibility to L. major [P. Scott, J. Immunol., 147:3149 (1991)]. However, IFN-γ by itself cannot induce T_(H)1 cell development. For example, as previously reported, when BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with a soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA), inclusion of IFN-γ in the vaccine enhanced protective immunity, but the bacterial adjuvant Corynebacterium parvum, was still required for protection, suggesting that other factors may be involved in the differentiation of T_(H)1 cells [P. Scott, cited above].

After subcutaneous injection of either live L. major parasites or SLA into BALB/c or C3H/HeN mice there is a rapid response in the draining lymph node (LN), characterized by a three- to five-fold increase in cell number and enhanced cytokine production. In BALB/c mice IL-4 is detected with three days, whereas in C3H/HeN mice the NK cell population expands and produces IFN-γ [P. Scott, cited above; and T. M. Scharton et al, J. Exp. Med., 178:567 (1993)].

B. Response to SLA

To determine whether administration of IL-12 alters the initial response to SLA in BALB/c mice, the following experiment was performed. SLA was prepared from L. major promastigates as described [P. Scott et al, J. Immunol., 139:221 (1987)]. BALB/c mice were inoculated in the right and left footpad with SLA (25 μg), SLA+IL-12 (0.5 μg), or IL-12 alone, and the popliteal LNs were harvested three days later. C3H/HeN mice were inoculated with SLA alone to provide a comparison of cytokine levels.

Cytokine production by popliteal LN cells taken three days after footpad injection with SLA/SLA+IL-12 was then assessed. LN cells were assayed for cytotoxic potential against ⁵¹Cr-labeled YAC-1 cells in a four-hour Cr-release assay at several effector to target ratios. For cytokine analysis, cells were cultured in 24-well plates at 5×10⁶ per milliliter per well in tissue culture medium [Dulbecco's minimum essential medium with glucose (4.5 mg/ml), 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin 6-phosphate (100 U/ml), streptomycin sulfate (100 μg/ml), 25 mM Hepes, and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol] with or without SLA (50 μg/ml). Supernatants were harvested at 72 hours and IFN-γ and IL-4 measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [T. M. Scharton et al, cited above].

As can be seen by reference to FIGS. 1A (only the data from cells cultured with SLA are shown in FIG. 1A) and 1B, LN cells from BALB/c mice injected with SLA produce IL-4 but little IFN-γ, whereas LN cells from C3H/HeN mice produce IFN-γ but little or no IL-4 (FIG. 1A). However, when BALB/c mice were injected with SLA+IL-12, IL-4 production was inhibited (no IL-4 was detected), substantial detectable amounts of IFN-γ, higher than those observed in the resistant C3H/HeN mouse strain, were promoted, and an NK cell response in the draining LN was induced at 72 hours. A similar effect was obtained with several doses of IL-12, including 1, 0.1, and 0.01 μg, although complete ablation of IL-4 was not achieved with the lowest dose [L. C. C. Afonso et al, unpublished data].

The source of the IFN-γ at this early time point has not been determined, although associated with the IFN-γ response was the induction of an NK cell cytotoxic response (FIG. 1B). However, administration of IL-12 alone enhanced NK cell cytotoxic function in the draining LN but failed to stimulate IFN-γ production (see, FIGS. 1A and 1B). This may be due to the capacity of SLA to stimulate the production of other cytokines, such as IL-2, which synergize with IL-12 to enhance IFN-γ production. This finding is compatible with the previous observation that the production of IFN-γ by NK cells during the first three days of L. major infection in C3H/HeN mice is dependent on IL-2 produced by CD4⁺ T cells [T. M. Scharton et al, cited above].

EXAMPLE 2 Induction of T_(H)1 Cells

The following experiment was performed to determine whether IL-12 induced the development of a CD4⁺ T_(H)1 cell population.

BALB/c mice were immunized as described in Example 1. Popliteal LNs and spleens were collected 10 days after the primary in vivo stimulation with SLA or SLA and IL-12, and restimulated in vitro with SLA only. The cytokine profile was then assessed.

CD4⁺ T cells were cultured at 2×10⁶ per milliliter with irradiated (3300 rad) normal spleen cells (3×10⁶ milliliter) as antigen-presenting cells. CD4⁺ T cells were positively selected on a magnetic cell separator (MACS, Miltenyl, Biotec, Sunnyvale, Calif.) as described [T. M. Scharton et al, cited above]. The CD4⁺ T cell-enriched population contained greater than 98% CD4⁺ T cells as assessed by cytofluorometric analysis.

To deplete NK cells, mice were treated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody to asialo GM1 [anti-asialoGM1 (ASGM1)] (WAKO, Richmond, Va.) on day 4 (1.5 mg intravenously) and day 0 (350 μg intravenously) [T. M. Scharton et al, cited above].

As seen by reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B, IL-12 in the presence of SLA induces differentiation of CD4⁺ T_(H)1 cells in the LN and the spleen. Immunization of the BALB/c mice with SLA primed for a dominant T_(H)2 type response characterized by high IL-4 production. Inclusion of IL-12 reversed this pattern, leading to a dominant T_(H)1 response characterized by elevated IFN-γ levels and little, if any, IL-4. A similar response was observed with both unfractionated lymphocytes and purified CD4⁺ T cells, indicating that IL-12 was specifically influencing CD4⁺ T_(H)1 development. In significant contrast, IL-12 administered without antigen had no effect on the capacity of either the LN or the spleen to produce IFN-γ.

EXAMPLE 3 Assessment of T_(H)1 Cell Response

Because an NK cell cytotoxic response was observed with LN cells two days after injection with IL-12 in Example 2 (FIG. 1B), an experiment was conducted to test whether the presence of NK cells contributed to the development of CD4⁺ T_(H)1 cells after immunization with SLA and IL-12.

Mice were depleted of NK cells by treatment with anti-asialo GM1 before immunization, which completely inhibited NK cell cytotoxic function [L. C. C. Afonso et al, cited above]. A comparison of the response in mice treated with anti-asialo GM1 before immunization with SLA+IL-12, and those not depleted of NK cells, indicated that the presence of NK cells during immunization significantly augmented subsequent T_(H)1 cell development (FIG. 2B). The requirement of NK cells is probably related to their ability to produce IFN-γ, since treatment of mice with anti-IFN-γ monoclonal antibodies also ablated the effects of IL-12. For example, the day 10 spleen cell IFN-γ levels were reported as follows: SLA+IL-12, 58.7 ng/ml; SLA+IL-12 pretreated with anti-IFN-γ, 5.1 ng/ml.

A requirement for the presence of IFN-γ for the in vitro development of T_(H)1 cells in response to IL-12 has been reported [S. E. Macatonia et al, Int. Immunol., 5:1119 (1993)] although in another in vitro system the capacity of IL-12 to initiate T_(H)1 cell development was found to be independent of IFN-γ [R. A. Seder et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:10188 (1993)]. The inventors suggest that NK cells may be one source of IFN-γ in vivo that augments T_(H)1 cell development. Similarly, recent findings in the SCID model with intracellular pathogens indicate that a common pathway for IFN-γ production is through the ability of IL-12 to activate NK cells [C. S. Tripp et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:3725 (1993) and R. T. Gazzinelli et al, ibid, p. 6115].

EXAMPLE 4 Use of IL-12 as Adjuvant

On the basis of the ability of IL-12 to direct the development of leishmanial-specific CD4⁺ T_(H)1 cells shown in Example 3 above, an experiment was conducted to demonstrate that IL-12 could act as an adjuvant in a vaccine against L. major.

BALB/c mice were immunized in the right footpad with SLA (25 μg) alone or a combination of SLA (25 μg)+IL-12 (1 μg). Ten days later mice were given an intradermal injection in the flank with SLA (10 μg) or SLA+IL-12 (1 μg). Two weeks later mice were challenged in the left footpad with 10⁵ purified metacyclic L. major promastigates.

The results of three experiments, reported graphically in FIGS. 3A and 3B, indicate that BALB/c mice immunized with SLA+IL-12 are protected against infection with L. major, as measured by the size of the infection-caused lesions. The mean lesion size of mice immunized with SLA+IL-12 at 10 weeks was 0.26±0.50 mm, while unimmunized mice, SLA immunized mice, or mice receiving only IL-12 exhibited lesions of 3 to 5 mm.

One group of mice immunized with SLA+IL-12 was maintained for 20 weeks with no signs of resumption of disease. The lesion size in these animals was as small as that produced in the resistant C3H/HeN mice (FIG. 3B).

Cytokine analysis indicated that control mice produced small amounts of IFN-γ and IL-4, whereas mice immunized with SLA+IL-12 produced little IL-4 but amounts of IFN-γ that were comparable to those observed in resistant C3H/HeN mice [L. C. C. Afonso et al, cited above].

Parasite quantitation in lesions of immunized mice 10 weeks after infection demonstrate that lesions from unimmunized BALB/c mice or mice that had been immunized with SLA alone or IL-12 alone contained greater than 10⁷ parasites, whereas BALB/c mice immunized with SLA+IL-12 contained 10³ parasites. See, Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 −log¹ (parasite Mouse strain Immunization titer) BALB/c None 8.1 ± 1.1 SLA 7.7 ± 0.8 IL-12 7.5 ± 0.3 SLA + IL-12  3.2 ± 1.9² C3H/HeN None 1.1 ± 0.1 ¹Data represent mean ± SD of at least five animals per group. ²P < 0.001 as compared with other BALB/c groups (Student's test).

Thus, this experiment demonstrated that vaccination of BALB/c mice with leishmanial antigens and IL-12 promoted the development of leishmanial-specific CD4⁺ T_(H)1 cells. These mice were resistant to subsequent infection with Leishmania major.

These above reported results demonstrate that IL-12 not only substitutes for conventional bacterial adjuvants, but is likely more efficacious than these conventional adjuvants due to its in vivo stability. Additionally, IL-12 is likely more safe for use in humans due to the fact that is produced recombinantly and purified from any bacterial vector components, and because it is a natural human protein which should not result in any secondary responses or sensitization, as do the bacterial adjuvants.

This adjuvanting effect of IL-12 in conjunction with a vaccine is significantly different than the systemic therapeutic uses previously reported for IL-12. For example, Heinzel et al, and Sypek et al, cited above, administered IL-12 multiple times systemically to BALB/c mice during an L. major infection and demonstrated enhanced resistance to the parasite. The enhanced resistance was found only if the IL-12 was administered early in the infection.

This effect is distinct from the adjuvant affects of IL-12 reported in this invention since IL-12 alone does not exhibit any protective effects against subsequent exposure to a pathogen (Table 1). The inventors have discovered that IL-12 in combination with an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism has a protective effect against exposure to the pathogen. This effect is greater than that caused by use of the antigen alone in the vaccine composition or method.

Further, when used as an adjuvant, IL-12 is administered less often and less frequently than systemic therapeutic administration of IL-12, and thereby has substantially lower risk of being present in a vaccinate in toxic levels. For example, an advantage of its use as a vaccine adjuvant is that IL-12 will only be administered as part of the original vaccine and as a booster. Thus, IL-12 should not accumulate in sufficient doses within the vaccinated host, particularly a human, to cause any adverse or toxic effects.

EXAMPLE 5 Use of IL-12 with a Cancer Vaccine

As described in S. Townsend, cited above, one design for a cancer vaccine may involve the soluble, cell surface (membrane)-bound glycoprotein, B7, which is expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APC) B7 is a counter receptor which interacts with the CD28 receptor on T cells to mediate adhesion between the APC and T cells and deliver activating signals to the T cells. Townsend and others have described the use of B7, transfected into tumor cells, as a cancer vaccine. That is, tumor cells from a patient may be removed and some of the cells transfected with B7, using conventional genetic engineering techniques. The transfected cells are then re-introduced into the patient by any mode of delivery, but particularly by subcutaneous delivery.

According to the present invention, IL-12 may be co-administered with this cancer vaccine, either as a protein, biologically active fragment thereof, or the nucleic acid sequence encoding the IL-12. It is anticipated that as DNA, IL-12 may be transfected into the same tumor cell as the B7 for co-administration. Other embodiments of this therapeutic composition include a protein composition containing B7 as a protein and IL-12, as described above for the pathogenic antigens.

The following series of experiments demonstrate that IL-12 is useful as a adjuvant for such a cancer therapeutic. More specifically, these experiments show that the stimulatory pathway of B7 and CD28, a homodimeric molecule of 44 kD subunits expressed on most CD4⁺ and about half of CD8⁺ human T cells, but not on natural killer cells [see, A. Aruffo et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 84:8573 (1987)] synergizes with IL-12 in inducing both efficient proliferation and cytokine production in human T cells. Thus, the addition of IL-12 to such a cancer vaccine enhances the therapeutic effect thereof.

A. Materials and Methods

CHO cell-derived rNKSF/IL-12 was provided by Dr. S. Wolf (Genetics Institute, Boston, Mass.); rIL-2 (10⁷ U/mg) was provided by the Division of Cancer Treatment (NCI, Bethesda, Md.); and CHO cell-derived hIL-10 (1.5×10⁷ U/mg), by Dr. K. Moore (DNAX, Palo Alto, Calif.). The following reagents were obtained from commercial sources: PHA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); heat-fixed Staphylococcus aureus Cowan strain 1 (Pansorbin, Calbiochem-Behring Corp., La Jolla, Calif.); 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA; Sigma Chemical Co.); CsA (Sandoz Forschungsinstitut GmbH, Vienna, Austria).

mAb OKT3-(IgG2a, anti-CD3) and OKM1-(IgG2b, anti-CD11b) producing cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, Md.); CK248 (IgM, anti-CD28 [A. Moretta et al, J. Exp. Med., 162:823 (1985)] and 93 (IgG1, anti-CD25) were kindly provided by Dr. Lorenzo Moretta (Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy); 1.12 (IgG2a, anti-HLA—DR) by Dr. Roberto Accolla (University of Verona, Italy); B52.1 (IgM, anti-CD14) [B. Perussia et al, Blood, 59:382 (1982)] was produced in our laboratory. The mAb 9.3 (IgG2a, anti-CD28 [J. Hansen e tal, Immunogenetics, 10:247 (1980)] was donated by Drs. J. Hansen (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash.); mAb B7.4 (IgG, anti-B7) and mAb CD28.1, CD28.2, CD28.3, CD28.5, 15E8 (IgG1, anti-CD28) [J. Nunes et al, Int. Immunol., 5:311 (1992)] were obtained through the participation in the 5th International Conference on Human Leucocyte Differentiation Antigens. The specificity of all the anti-CD28 antibodies used was assigned at the Conference Workshop and confirmed in our laboratory by reactivity in immunofluorescence with CD28-transfected J32 cell line, but not with the CD28-negative parental cell lines. In immunofluorescence, mAb 9.3 inhibits the binding of mAb CK248 to CD28⁺ T cells. Anti-IL-2 polyclonal goat antiserum was prepared in our laboratory and, at 1:200 dilution, completely neutralizes the activity of≧100 U/ml of IL-2. CTLA-4Ig [P. S. Linsley et al, J. Exp. Med., 174:561 (1991)] and B7-transfected CHO cells [P. S. Linsley et al, J. Exp. Med., 173:721 (1991)] were kindly provided by Dr. Peter S. Linsley (Bristol-Meyers; Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Seattle, Wash.); B7-transfected L cells [E. E. Murphy et al, J. Exp. Med., in press (1993)] by Dr. Lewis Lanier (DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif.).

B. Cytokine Assays

Radioimmunoassays (RIA) for human IFN-γ and human tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were performed as described [M. Murphy et al, J. Exp. Med., 164:263 (1986) and M. C. Cuturi et al, J. Exp. Med., 165:1581 (1987)] using mAbs B133.1/B133.5 and B154.9/B154.7, respectively. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM—CSF) was measured by a newly developed double determinant RIA using antibody C9.1 bound to plastic as capture antibody and antibody C16.3 as ¹²⁵I-labeled detection antibody according t6 the same protocol previously described for IFN-γ and TNF-α RIA [M. Murphy et al, cited above and M. C. Cuturi et al, cited above]. Recombinant cytokines were used to standardize all assays.

C. Preparation of Human PBMC

Peripheral blood obtained from healthy donors was anticoagulated with heparin. PBMC were separated on Ficoll-Hypaque (Lymphoprep; Nyegard and Co., Oslo, Norway) density gradient, and lymphocytes (PBL) were obtained after adherence of PBMC to plastic flasks (1 hour, 37° C.). In some experiments, purified preparations of small high density lymphocytes were purified on a discontinuous Percoll gradient [T. Timonen et al, J. Exp. Med., 153:569 (1981)]. These preparations were devoid of cycling cells, as determined by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry analysis, and did not express significant levels of activation markers CD25, CD69, CD71, and 4F2. Approximately two thirds of the CD4⁺ cells contained in these populations were CD45 RA⁺, a phenotype attributed to naive T cells. PHA-blasts (>98% activated T cells), as determined by indirect immunofluorescence with anti-leukocyte subset antibodies, were obtained after 5-day culture of PBL in the presence of 5 μg/ml of PHA [S. H. Chan et al, J. Immunol., 148:92 (1992) and S. H. Chan et al, J. Exp. Med., 173:869 (1991)]. Cells were cultured in 200 μl RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, Calif.) in 96-well round-bottomed plates (Flow Laboratories, McLean, Va.) with 0.2×10⁶ cells/well for proliferation and 1×10⁶ cells/well for cytokine production. For detection of thymidine (³H—TdR) uptake, 1 μCi/well of ³H—TdR was added to the wells in the last 6 hours of culture; cells were collected on a glass filter and radioactivity measured. All cultures were performed in triplicate.

D. Immunofluorescence Assay

This assay was performed as described [B. Perussia et al, J. Immunol., 130:2133 (1983)]. Briefly, cells were sequentially incubated (30 minutes, 4° C.) with saturating concentrations of antibodies in PBS containing 1% gelatin, 1% human plasma and 0.1% NaN₃, washed 3 times and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat F(ab′)₂ anti-mouse Ig (Cappel Laboratories, Cochranville, Pa.; absorbed to human IgG-Sepharose before use), washed again, and analyzed for fluorescence and light scatter using an Ortho Cytofluorograf 50 H connected to a 2100 Data Handling System (Ortho Instruments, Westwood, Mass.).

E. Synergy between IL-12 and Anti-CD28 antibody

In a first experiment, it was shown that IL-12 synergizes with anti-CD28 antibody CK248 and IL-2 in inducing proliferation of PHA-blasts in activated and freshly isolated peripheral blood human T cells. Briefly described, PHA-activated blast cell preparations were obtained after 5 days culture of PBL in the presence of 5 μg/ml PHA in order to avoid the background proliferation observed in PHA-induced cells collected at an earlier time of culture. These preparations were incubated for 3 or 6 days with varying concentrations of IL-12 or IL-2 and no antibodies or 0.04% CD28, 0.2% CD28, or 1% CD28 ascites containing the anti-CD28 antibody CK248. ³H—TDR uptake was evaluated after a 6-hour pulse at the end of the culture period.

Results of this experiment (not shown) indicated that increasing concentrations of IL-12 induced modest proliferation in PRA-blasts both at day 3 and 6 of culture, whereas IL-2 alone induced efficient proliferation, with a maximum effect observed around 10 ng/ml. The anti-CD28 antibody CK248, in the absence of IL-12 or IL-2, induced proliferation at day 3 when used at a concentration of ascites fluid of 1:500 or higher. Proliferation at day 6 was lower. Addition of antibody CK248 induced a modest synergistic enhancement of IL-2-induced proliferation but a strong synergistic enhancement of IL-12-induced proliferation.

IL-12 in the presence of CK248 was effective at concentrations as low as 5 pg/ml and induced equivalent 3H—TdR uptake at concentrations 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lower than those required with IL-2.

Also tested was the ability of anti-CD28-antibody CK248 to synergize with IL-2 and IL-12 in inducing proliferation of freshly isolated PBL. Synergistic effect with IL-12 was observed at day 6, but not at day 3; although a modest enhancement of IL-2-induced proliferation was already observed at day 3. A similar kinetics of proliferation, with maximum ³H—TDR uptake at day 6, was also induced by mAb—CD 248 and IL-12 in two experiments using Percoll-separated high density small lymphocytes.

F. Kinetics of Proliferation

Another experiment demonstrated the kinetics of proliferation of PHA blasts in response to IL-2, IL-12, and anti-CD28 antibodies. Briefly described, PHA-blasts were incubated with the anti-CD28 antibody CK248 (ascites 1%), IL-2 (100 ng/ml), or IL-12 (0.5 ng/ml) and ³H—TdR uptake was evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 days after a 6-hour pulse.

Results demonstrated that antibody CK248 was found to induce a proliferative effect only early in the culture, whereas the modest proliferation induced with IL-12 was observed from 1 to 6 days and the proliferation induced by IL-2, CK248 and IL-2, or CK248 and IL-12 was maximum at day 6 and declined at later times.

G. Synergy between B7-transfected cells and IL-12 in inducing proliferation of PHA blasts

PHA blasts were incubated with the anti-CD28 antibody CK248 (ascites 0.2%) or with different numbers of L-cells transfected or not with the B7 antigen in the presence or not of IL-12 (1 ng/ml). ³H—TdR uptake (cpm) was evaluated at 3 days after a 6-hour pulse.

Results shown in FIG. 4 are from one experiment representative of three performed and illustrate that a synergistic proliferative effect with IL-12 was observed by stimulating PHA blasts with L cells transfected with the CD28-ligand B7, but not with non-transfected cells.

H. Synergy between anti-CD-28 antibody CK248 and B7-transfected CHO cells with IL-12 in inducing IFN-γ production from PHA blasts

Briefly described, PHA blasts were cultured for 8 hours in the presence of medium or increasing concentrations of IL-12 and the dilutions of ascites of 1 ng/ml, 0.3 ng/ml or 0.1 ng/ml containing the anti-CD28 mAB CK248, parental CHO cells or B7 transfected CHO cells at the PHA blast:CHO cell ratios indicated in FIG. 5. At the end of the culture, cell free supernatant fluids were collected and IFN-γ assayed by the RIA described above in paragraph B.

The results illustrated in FIG. 5 are mean±S.E. of 4 experiments. IL-12 synergizes with stimulation of CD28 by antibodies or by its ligand B7 in inducing production of IFN-γ from PHA-blasts. Control parental CHO cells or control ascites (not shown) had no significant effect. Identical results were obtained with B7-transfected L cells (not shown).

I. Synergy between anti-CD28 antibody CK248 and B7-transfected CHO-cells with IL-12 in inducing cytokine (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and GM—CSF) production from PHA-blasts

Briefly described, PHA-blasts were cultured for 18 hours in the presence of medium or in the presence of anti-CD28 mAb CK248 (ascites 1:100), parental CHO cells, B7-transfected CHO cells (ratio PHA-blast:CHO-cells, 10:1). As indicated by the differently shaded columns in FIGS. 6A through 6C, cultures were also stimulated in the presence of IL-12 (1 ng/ml), IL-2 (100 ng/ml), or plastic-bound anti-CD3 OKT3 mAb (5 μg/ml). For comparison, combinations of these three stimuli with IL-12 and IL-2 (final concentrations 1 ng/ml and 100 ng/ml, respectively) are shown in the two rightmost groups of bars in each figure.

At the end of the 18-hour culture, cell-free supernatant fluids were collected and the three above-identified cytokines measured by RIA described above in paragraph B. Results illustrated in FIGS. 6A through 6C are mean±S.E. of 3 experiments. Anti-CD28 mAb CK248 and B7-transfected CHO cells induced the production by PHA-blasts not only of IFN-γ, but also of TNF-α and GM—CSF, and this effect was enhanced by co-stimulation with IL-12 or plastic-bound anti-CD3 mAb, and, to a lesser extent by IL-2. However, IL-12 was particularly effective in stimulating IFN-γ production as indicated by the fact that anti-CD28 mAb or B7-CHO induced maximal IFN-γ production when in combination with IL-12, whereas they induced TNF-α and GM—CSF more efficiently when combined with plastic-bound anti-CD3. A strong synergy of IL-12 with IL-2 or anti-CD3 was also observed in the induction of IFN-γ production, but not of TNF-α or GM—CSF.

J. Assaying Effect of a B7 ligand on Synercry between IL-12 and B7

To analyze whether the B7-CD28 interaction plays a role in the IL-12-induced IFN-γ production by PBMC, the ability of the chimeric recombinant soluble B7-ligand CTLA-4Ig to inhibit IFN-γ production was tested. PBL or PHA-blasts were cultured for 18 hours in medium or in the presence of the chimeric protein CTLA-4Ig (concentrations of 0, 1 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml) and stimulated with IL-12 (1 ng/ml) or B7-transfected CHO cells (PHA-blast:CHO cell ratio, 10:1), each component alone or combined. At the end of the culture, cell-free supernatant fluid was collected and IFN-γ assayed by the above-described RIA.

FIGS. 7A and 7B indicate a representative experiment out of 4 performed. CTLA-4Ig efficiently inhibited the production of IFNγ in PBMC preparations stimulated with IL-12 at the same concentration at which it inhibited the enhancing effect of B7-CHO cells on IFN-γ production by PHA-blasts, stimulated or not with IL-12. Equivalent concentrations of normal human IgG had no effect on IFN-γ production.

The series of experiments summarized above provided results which demonstrate that, in the presence of an appropriate co-stimulus, i.e., signaling through the CD28 receptor induced by B7-transfected cells or certain anti-CD28 antibodies, IL-12 can induce powerful and prolonged proliferation in activated T cells. Not only were the maximal levels of proliferation obtained with IL-12 higher than those induced by IL-2, but IL-12 was maximally effective at concentrations 100- to 1000-fold lower than effective concentrations of IL-2. Moreover, the synergistic proliferation induced by IL-12 and anti-CD28 antibody was also observed with freshly isolated PBL. On both freshly isolated PBL or activated PHA-blasts, anti-CD28 antibodies or B7-transfected cells also synergized with IL-12 in inducing cytokine production.

The synergistic effect of the B7/CD28 costimulatory pathway with IL-12 was observed not only for the proliferation of T cells, but also for the production of cytokines, particularly IFN-γ. The combination of anti-CD28 or B7-transfected cells with IL-12 is the most efficient condition for stimulation of IFN-γ production in freshly isolated or lectin-activated T cells yet described. Other cytokines such as TNF-α and GM—CSF were also induced by a combination of IL-12 and CD28 receptor stimulation.

Because the synergistic effects of CD28 stimulation with IL-12 are observed using the physiologic CD28 ligand B7, it is likely that the response observed with CK248 and other anti-CD28 mAb in the presence of IL-12 reflects the physiologic response of activation of the B7/CD28 costimulatory pathway.

CTLA-4Ig inhibited the production of IFN-γ more than 5-fold in PBMC stimulated with IL-12 alone, suggesting that interaction of T cells with B7 expressed on accessory cells in PBMC has an important role in the responsiveness of fresh peripheral blood cells to IL-12.

In other experiments, it was observed that the ability of IL-12 and anti-CD28 antibodies combined to induce IFN-γ production in PBMC was completely resistant to IL-10.

The ability of monocyte-macrophages and B cells to present a surface counter-receptor and to secrete a soluble cytokine that cooperate with each other in a potent synergistic effect in inducing T cell activation, both in terms of proliferation and cytokine production, is likely to have physiologic significance in vivo during inflammation and immune response.

T cells activated by the B7/CD28 interaction and IL-12 also produce GM—CSF and TNF-α, which may also participate in macrophage activation and enhanced production of IL-12. This effect is likely to amplify both phagocytic cell and T cell activation, e.g., in bacteria-induced inflammation, until negative feedback mechanisms mediated by IL-10 and possibly by IL-4, TGF-β, and other pharmacologic mediators that interrupt this amplifying circle. The synergy between the B7/CD28 pathway and IL-12 demonstrated by the above experiments indicates that IL-12 is a desirable adjuvant for a cancer vaccine or cancer therapeutic, such as that described by Townsend et al, cited above. For example, co-administration to a patient of a tumor cell transfected with B7 and IL-12 would provide the same type of synergy, e.g., cytokine production and T cell stimulation, preferably directed against the tumor. Thus, such a composition may be employed as a cancer therapeutic, or as a ‘vaccine’ to prevent reoccurence of a tumor, which has been surgically or otherwise removed.

The above experiments also indicate-that the administration of a composition comprising B7 and IL-12 may also be useful as a first line of defense against infections. These results strongly suggest that in the presence of IL-12 and B7 expression on accessory cells, T cells are likely to participate in these non-antigen specific mechanisms. The participation of T cells may be dependent on and follow NK cell activation and production of IFN-γ.

It is therefore likely that the synergistic effect between B7 and IL-12 is important for the activation and differentiation of quiescent T cells as well as for the maintained activation of the effector functions of established mature Th1 clones.

Numerous modifications and variations in practice of this invention are expected to occur to those skilled in the art, and are considered to be encompassed by the following claims.

4 2362 base pairs nucleic acid double unknown cDNA unknown CDS 33..1016 1 GAATTCCGTC GACTCTAGAG GCCCAGAGCA AG ATG TGT CAC CAG CAG TTG GTC 53 Met Cys His Gln Gln Leu Val 1 5 ATC TCT TGG TTT TCC CTG GTT TTT CTG GCA TCT CCC CTC GTG GCC ATA 101 Ile Ser Trp Phe Ser Leu Val Phe Leu Ala Ser Pro Leu Val Ala Ile 10 15 20 TGG GAA CTG AAG AAA GAT GTT TAT GTC GTA GAA TTG GAT TGG TAT CCG 149 Trp Glu Leu Lys Lys Asp Val Tyr Val Val Glu Leu Asp Trp Tyr Pro 25 30 35 GAT GCC CCT GGA GAA ATG GTG GTC CTC ACC TGT GAC ACC CCT GAA GAA 197 Asp Ala Pro Gly Glu Met Val Val Leu Thr Cys Asp Thr Pro Glu Glu 40 45 50 55 GAT GGT ATC ACC TGG ACC TTG GAC CAG AGC AGT GAG GTC TTA GGC TCT 245 Asp Gly Ile Thr Trp Thr Leu Asp Gln Ser Ser Glu Val Leu Gly Ser 60 65 70 GGC AAA ACC CTG ACC ATC CAA GTC AAA GAG TTT GGA GAT GCT GGC CAG 293 Gly Lys Thr Leu Thr Ile Gln Val Lys Glu Phe Gly Asp Ala Gly Gln 75 80 85 TAC ACC TGT CAC AAA GGA GGC GAG GTT CTA AGC CAT TCG CTC CTG CTG 341 Tyr Thr Cys His Lys Gly Gly Glu Val Leu Ser His Ser Leu Leu Leu 90 95 100 CTT CAC AAA AAG GAA GAT GGA ATT TGG TCC ACT GAT ATT TTA AAG GAC 389 Leu His Lys Lys Glu Asp Gly Ile Trp Ser Thr Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp 105 110 115 CAG AAA GAA CCC AAA AAT AAG ACC TTT CTA AGA TGC GAG GCC AAG AAT 437 Gln Lys Glu Pro Lys Asn Lys Thr Phe Leu Arg Cys Glu Ala Lys Asn 120 125 130 135 TAT TCT GGA CGT TTC ACC TGC TGG TGG CTG ACG ACA ATC AGT ACT GAT 485 Tyr Ser Gly Arg Phe Thr Cys Trp Trp Leu Thr Thr Ile Ser Thr Asp 140 145 150 TTG ACA TTC AGT GTC AAA AGC AGC AGA GGC TCT TCT GAC CCC CAA GGG 533 Leu Thr Phe Ser Val Lys Ser Ser Arg Gly Ser Ser Asp Pro Gln Gly 155 160 165 GTG ACG TGC GGA GCT GCT ACA CTC TCT GCA GAG AGA GTC AGA GGG GAC 581 Val Thr Cys Gly Ala Ala Thr Leu Ser Ala Glu Arg Val Arg Gly Asp 170 175 180 AAC AAG GAG TAT GAG TAC TCA GTG GAG TGC CAG GAG GAC AGT GCC TGC 629 Asn Lys Glu Tyr Glu Tyr Ser Val Glu Cys Gln Glu Asp Ser Ala Cys 185 190 195 CCA GCT GCT GAG GAG AGT CTG CCC ATT GAG GTC ATG GTG GAT GCC GTT 677 Pro Ala Ala Glu Glu Ser Leu Pro Ile Glu Val Met Val Asp Ala Val 200 205 210 215 CAC AAG CTC AAG TAT GAA AAC TAC ACC AGC AGC TTC TTC ATC AGG GAC 725 His Lys Leu Lys Tyr Glu Asn Tyr Thr Ser Ser Phe Phe Ile Arg Asp 220 225 230 ATC ATC AAA CCT GAC CCA CCC AAG AAC TTG CAG CTG AAG CCA TTA AAG 773 Ile Ile Lys Pro Asp Pro Pro Lys Asn Leu Gln Leu Lys Pro Leu Lys 235 240 245 AAT TCT CGG CAG GTG GAG GTC AGC TGG GAG TAC CCT GAC ACC TGG AGT 821 Asn Ser Arg Gln Val Glu Val Ser Trp Glu Tyr Pro Asp Thr Trp Ser 250 255 260 ACT CCA CAT TCC TAC TTC TCC CTG ACA TTC TGC GTT CAG GTC CAG GGC 869 Thr Pro His Ser Tyr Phe Ser Leu Thr Phe Cys Val Gln Val Gln Gly 265 270 275 AAG AGC AAG AGA GAA AAG AAA GAT AGA GTC TTC ACG GAC AAG ACC TCA 917 Lys Ser Lys Arg Glu Lys Lys Asp Arg Val Phe Thr Asp Lys Thr Ser 280 285 290 295 GCC ACG GTC ATC TGC CGC AAA AAT GCC AGC ATT AGC GTG CGG GCC CAG 965 Ala Thr Val Ile Cys Arg Lys Asn Ala Ser Ile Ser Val Arg Ala Gln 300 305 310 GAC CGC TAC TAT AGC TCA TCT TGG AGC GAA TGG GCA TCT GTG CCC TGC 1013 Asp Arg Tyr Tyr Ser Ser Ser Trp Ser Glu Trp Ala Ser Val Pro Cys 315 320 325 AGT TAGGTTCTGA TCCAGGATGA AAATTTGGAG GAAAAGTGGA AGATATTAAG 1066 Ser CAAAATGTTT AAAGACACAA CGGAATAGAC CCAAAAAGAT AATTTCTATC TGATTTGCTT 1126 TAAAACGTTT TTTTAGGATC ACAATGATAT CTTTGCTGTA TTTGTATAGT TCGATGCTAA 1186 ATGCTCATTG AAACAATCAG CTAATTTATG TATAGATTTT CCAGCTCTCA AGTTGCCATG 1246 GGCCTTCATG CTATTTAAAT ATTTAAGTAA TTTATGTATT TATTAGTATA TTACTGTTAT 1306 TTAACGTTTG TCTGCCAGGA TGTATGGAAT GTTTCATACT CTTATGACCT GATCCATCAG 1366 GATCAGTCCC TATTATGCAA AATGTGAATT TAATTTTATT TGTACTGACA ACTTTTCAAG 1426 CAAGGCTGCA AGTACATCAG TTTTATGACA ATCAGGAAGA ATGCAGTGTT CTGATACCAG 1486 TGCCATCATA CACTTGTGAT GGATGGGAAC GCAAGAGATA CTTACATGGA AACCTGACAA 1546 TGCAAACCTG TTGAGAAGAT CCAGGAGAAC AAGATGCTAG TTCCCATGTC TGTGAAGACT 1606 TCCTGGAGAT GGTGTTGATA AAGCAATTTA GGGCCACTTA CACTTCTAAG CAAGTTTAAT 1666 CTTTGGATGC CTGAATTTTA AAAGGGCTAG AAAAAAATGA TTGACCAGCC TGGGAAACAT 1726 AACAAGACCC CGTCTCTACA AAAAAAATTT AAAATTAGCC AGGCGTGGTG GCTCATGCTT 1786 GTGGTCCCAG CTGTTCAGGA GGATGAGGCA GGAGGATCTC TTGAGCCCAG GAGGTCAAGG 1846 CTATGGTGAG CCGTGATTGT GCCACTGCAT ACCAGCCTAG GTGACAGAAT GAGACCCTGT 1906 CTCAAAAAAA AAAATGATTG AAATTAAAAT TCAGCTTTAG CTTCCATGGC AGTCCTCACC 1966 CCCACCTCTC TAAAAGACAC AGGAGGATGA CACAGAAACA CCGTAAGTGT CTGGAAGGCA 2026 AAAAGATCTT AAGATTCAAG AGAGAGGACA AGTAGTTATG GCTAAGGACA TGAAATTGTC 2086 AGAATGGCAG GTGGCTTCTT AACAGCCATG TGAGAAGCAG ACAGATGCAA AGAAAATCTG 2146 GAATCCCTTT CTCATTAGCA TGAATGAACC TGATACACAA TTATGACCAG AAAATATGGC 2206 TCCATGAAGG TGCTACTTTT AAGTAATGTA TGTGCGCTCT GTAAAGTGAT TACATTTGTT 2266 TCCTGTTTGT TTATTTATTT ATTTATTTTT GCATTCTGAG GCTGAACTAA TAAAAACTCT 2326 TCTTTGTAAT CAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAC TCTAGA 2362 328 amino acids amino acid linear protein unknown 2 Met Cys His Gln Gln Leu Val Ile Ser Trp Phe Ser Leu Val Phe Leu 1 5 10 15 Ala Ser Pro Leu Val Ala Ile Trp Glu Leu Lys Lys Asp Val Tyr Val 20 25 30 Val Glu Leu Asp Trp Tyr Pro Asp Ala Pro Gly Glu Met Val Val Leu 35 40 45 Thr Cys Asp Thr Pro Glu Glu Asp Gly Ile Thr Trp Thr Leu Asp Gln 50 55 60 Ser Ser Glu Val Leu Gly Ser Gly Lys Thr Leu Thr Ile Gln Val Lys 65 70 75 80 Glu Phe Gly Asp Ala Gly Gln Tyr Thr Cys His Lys Gly Gly Glu Val 85 90 95 Leu Ser His Ser Leu Leu Leu Leu His Lys Lys Glu Asp Gly Ile Trp 100 105 110 Ser Thr Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp Gln Lys Glu Pro Lys Asn Lys Thr Phe 115 120 125 Leu Arg Cys Glu Ala Lys Asn Tyr Ser Gly Arg Phe Thr Cys Trp Trp 130 135 140 Leu Thr Thr Ile Ser Thr Asp Leu Thr Phe Ser Val Lys Ser Ser Arg 145 150 155 160 Gly Ser Ser Asp Pro Gln Gly Val Thr Cys Gly Ala Ala Thr Leu Ser 165 170 175 Ala Glu Arg Val Arg Gly Asp Asn Lys Glu Tyr Glu Tyr Ser Val Glu 180 185 190 Cys Gln Glu Asp Ser Ala Cys Pro Ala Ala Glu Glu Ser Leu Pro Ile 195 200 205 Glu Val Met Val Asp Ala Val His Lys Leu Lys Tyr Glu Asn Tyr Thr 210 215 220 Ser Ser Phe Phe Ile Arg Asp Ile Ile Lys Pro Asp Pro Pro Lys Asn 225 230 235 240 Leu Gln Leu Lys Pro Leu Lys Asn Ser Arg Gln Val Glu Val Ser Trp 245 250 255 Glu Tyr Pro Asp Thr Trp Ser Thr Pro His Ser Tyr Phe Ser Leu Thr 260 265 270 Phe Cys Val Gln Val Gln Gly Lys Ser Lys Arg Glu Lys Lys Asp Arg 275 280 285 Val Phe Thr Asp Lys Thr Ser Ala Thr Val Ile Cys Arg Lys Asn Ala 290 295 300 Ser Ile Ser Val Arg Ala Gln Asp Arg Tyr Tyr Ser Ser Ser Trp Ser 305 310 315 320 Glu Trp Ala Ser Val Pro Cys Ser 325 1364 base pairs nucleic acid double unknown cDNA unknown CDS 101..859 3 GTCACCGAGA AGCTGATGTA GAGAGAGACA CAGAAGGAGA CAGAAAGCAA GAGACCAGAG 60 TCCCGGGAAA GTCCTGCCGC GCCTCGGGAC AATTATAAAA ATG TGG CCC CCT GGG 115 Met Trp Pro Pro Gly 1 5 TCA GCC TCC CAG CCA CCG CCC TCA CCT GCC GCG GCC ACA GGT CTG CAT 163 Ser Ala Ser Gln Pro Pro Pro Ser Pro Ala Ala Ala Thr Gly Leu His 10 15 20 CCA GCG GCT CGC CCT GTG TCC CTG CAG TGC CGG CTC AGC ATG TGT CCA 211 Pro Ala Ala Arg Pro Val Ser Leu Gln Cys Arg Leu Ser Met Cys Pro 25 30 35 GCG CGC AGC CTC CTC CTT GTG GCT ACC CTG GTC CTC CTG GAC CAC CTC 259 Ala Arg Ser Leu Leu Leu Val Ala Thr Leu Val Leu Leu Asp His Leu 40 45 50 AGT TTG GCC AGA AAC CTC CCC GTG GCC ACT CCA GAC CCA GGA ATG TTC 307 Ser Leu Ala Arg Asn Leu Pro Val Ala Thr Pro Asp Pro Gly Met Phe 55 60 65 CCA TGC CTT CAC CAC TCC CAA AAC CTG CTG AGG GCC GTC AGC AAC ATG 355 Pro Cys Leu His His Ser Gln Asn Leu Leu Arg Ala Val Ser Asn Met 70 75 80 85 CTC CAG AAG GCC AGA CAA ACT CTA GAA TTT TAC CCT TGC ACT TCT GAA 403 Leu Gln Lys Ala Arg Gln Thr Leu Glu Phe Tyr Pro Cys Thr Ser Glu 90 95 100 GAG ATT GAT CAT GAA GAT ATC ACA AAA GAT AAA ACC AGC ACA GTG GAG 451 Glu Ile Asp His Glu Asp Ile Thr Lys Asp Lys Thr Ser Thr Val Glu 105 110 115 GCC TGT TTA CCA TTG GAA TTA ACC AAG AAT GAG AGT TGC CTA AAT TCC 499 Ala Cys Leu Pro Leu Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Glu Ser Cys Leu Asn Ser 120 125 130 AGA GAG ACC TCT TTC ATA ACT AAT GGG AGT TGC CTG GCC TCC AGA AAG 547 Arg Glu Thr Ser Phe Ile Thr Asn Gly Ser Cys Leu Ala Ser Arg Lys 135 140 145 ACC TCT TTT ATG ATG GCC CTG TGC CTT AGT AGT ATT TAT GAA GAC TTG 595 Thr Ser Phe Met Met Ala Leu Cys Leu Ser Ser Ile Tyr Glu Asp Leu 150 155 160 165 AAG ATG TAC CAG GTG GAG TTC AAG ACC ATG AAT GCA AAG CTT CTG ATG 643 Lys Met Tyr Gln Val Glu Phe Lys Thr Met Asn Ala Lys Leu Leu Met 170 175 180 GAT CCT AAG AGG CAG ATC TTT CTA GAT CAA AAC ATG CTG GCA GTT ATT 691 Asp Pro Lys Arg Gln Ile Phe Leu Asp Gln Asn Met Leu Ala Val Ile 185 190 195 GAT GAG CTG ATG CAG GCC CTG AAT TTC AAC AGT GAG ACT GTG CCA CAA 739 Asp Glu Leu Met Gln Ala Leu Asn Phe Asn Ser Glu Thr Val Pro Gln 200 205 210 AAA TCC TCC CTT GAA GAA CCG GAT TTT TAT AAA ACT AAA ATC AAG CTC 787 Lys Ser Ser Leu Glu Glu Pro Asp Phe Tyr Lys Thr Lys Ile Lys Leu 215 220 225 TGC ATA CTT CTT CAT GCT TTC AGA ATT CGG GCA GTG ACT ATT GAT AGA 835 Cys Ile Leu Leu His Ala Phe Arg Ile Arg Ala Val Thr Ile Asp Arg 230 235 240 245 GTG ATG AGC TAT CTG AAT GCT TCC TAAAAAAGCG AGGTCCCTCC AAACCGTTGT 889 Val Met Ser Tyr Leu Asn Ala Ser 250 CATTTTTATA AAACTTTGAA ATGAGGAAAC TTTGATAGGA TGTGGATTAA GAACTAGGGA 949 GGGGGAAAGA AGGATGGGAC TATTACATCC ACATGATACC TCTGATCAAG TATTTTTGAC 1009 ATTTACTGTG GATAAATTGT TTTTAAGTTT TCATGAATGA ATTGCTAAGA AGGGAAAATA 1069 TCCATCCTGA AGGTGTTTTT CATTCACTTT AATAGAAGGG CAAATATTTA TAAGCTATTT 1129 CTGTACCAAA GTGTTTGTGG AAACAAACAT GTAAGCATAA CTTATTTTAA AATATTTATT 1189 TATATAACTT GGTAATCATG AAAGCATCTG AGCTAACTTA TATTTATTTA TGTTATATTT 1249 ATTAAATTAT TCATCAAGTG TATTTGAAAA ATATTTTTAA GTGTTCTAAA AATAAAAGTA 1309 TTGAATTAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAA 1364 253 amino acids amino acid linear protein unknown 4 Met Trp Pro Pro Gly Ser Ala Ser Gln Pro Pro Pro Ser Pro Ala Ala 1 5 10 15 Ala Thr Gly Leu His Pro Ala Ala Arg Pro Val Ser Leu Gln Cys Arg 20 25 30 Leu Ser Met Cys Pro Ala Arg Ser Leu Leu Leu Val Ala Thr Leu Val 35 40 45 Leu Leu Asp His Leu Ser Leu Ala Arg Asn Leu Pro Val Ala Thr Pro 50 55 60 Asp Pro Gly Met Phe Pro Cys Leu His His Ser Gln Asn Leu Leu Arg 65 70 75 80 Ala Val Ser Asn Met Leu Gln Lys Ala Arg Gln Thr Leu Glu Phe Tyr 85 90 95 Pro Cys Thr Ser Glu Glu Ile Asp His Glu Asp Ile Thr Lys Asp Lys 100 105 110 Thr Ser Thr Val Glu Ala Cys Leu Pro Leu Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Glu 115 120 125 Ser Cys Leu Asn Ser Arg Glu Thr Ser Phe Ile Thr Asn Gly Ser Cys 130 135 140 Leu Ala Ser Arg Lys Thr Ser Phe Met Met Ala Leu Cys Leu Ser Ser 145 150 155 160 Ile Tyr Glu Asp Leu Lys Met Tyr Gln Val Glu Phe Lys Thr Met Asn 165 170 175 Ala Lys Leu Leu Met Asp Pro Lys Arg Gln Ile Phe Leu Asp Gln Asn 180 185 190 Met Leu Ala Val Ile Asp Glu Leu Met Gln Ala Leu Asn Phe Asn Ser 195 200 205 Glu Thr Val Pro Gln Lys Ser Ser Leu Glu Glu Pro Asp Phe Tyr Lys 210 215 220 Thr Lys Ile Lys Leu Cys Ile Leu Leu His Ala Phe Arg Ile Arg Ala 225 230 235 240 Val Thr Ile Asp Arg Val Met Ser Tyr Leu Asn Ala Ser 245 250 

What is claimed is:
 1. A composition comprising a selected antigen from a pathogenic microorganism and an effective adjuvanting amount of Interleukin-12, said composition eliciting a vaccinated host's cell mediated immune response against said pathogenic microorganism.
 2. The composition according to claim 1 wherein Interleukin-12 is in the form of a protein or peptide fragment thereof.
 3. The composition according to claim 1 wherein Interleukin-12 is in the form of a nucleotide sequence encoding the IL-12 protein or a fragment thereof.
 4. The composition according to claim 1 wherein said pathogen is an intracellular parasite.
 5. The composition according to claim 4 wherein said pathogen is a virus.
 6. The composition according to claim 5 wherein said virus is selected from the group consisting of HIV, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, rabies virus, Herpes viruses, Cytomegalovirus, poliovirus, influenza virus, meningitis virus, measles virus, mumps virus, rubella, varicella, pertussis, encephalitis virus, papilloma virus, yellow fever virus, Epstein-Barr virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parvovirus, chikungunya virus, haemorrhagic fever viruses, and Klebsiella.
 7. The composition according to claim 1 wherein said pathogen is an extracellular parasite.
 8. The composition according to claim 7 wherein said pathogen is selected from the group consisting of a bacterium, a protozoan, and a helminth.
 9. The composition according to claim 7 wherein said pathogen causes leprosy, tuberculosis, leishmania, malaria, and schistosomiasis.
 10. The composition according to claim 2 wherein said IL-12 is full-length recombinant IL-12, or a fragment thereof which has the biological activity of the full-length IL-12.
 11. The composition according to claim 10 wherein said effective amount of IL-12 is about 0.1 μg to about 0.5 mg of IL-12 per 25 μg of antigen.
 12. A method for increasing the ability of a composition containing an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism or from a cancer cell to elicit a vaccinated host's cell mediated immune response against said pathogenic microorganism or cancer comprising administering to a host simultaneously or sequentially with said composition, an effective amount of Interleukin-12 or a biologically active fragment thereof.
 13. A method for increasing the ability of a composition containing an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism to elicit a vaccinated host's cell mediated immune response against said pathogenic microorganism comprising administering to a host a composition of claim
 1. 14. A composition comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding a selected antigen and an effective adjuvanting amount of a polynucleotide sequence encoding Interleukin-12, said composition expressing said antigen and said IL-12 in a host cell and eliciting the host's cell mediated immune response, thereby generating a protective an immune response to said pathogen.
 15. The composition according to claim 3 wherein said Interleukin-12-encoding nucleotide sequence encodes the IL-12 full length protein or a fragment thereof which has the biological activity of the full-length IL-12.
 16. A method for increasing the ability of an immunogenic composition containing an antigen from a pathogenic microorganism or from a cancer cell to elicit a vaccinated host's cell mediated immune response against said pathogenic microorganism or cancer comprising administering to a host simultaneously or sequentially with said immunogenic composition, an effective amount of a polynucleotide sequence encoding Interleukin-12 or a biologically active fragment thereof. 